Consideration can be defined as the value that one party offers in exchange for the promise of another party. A contract is deemed legally binding only when both parties are obligated to provide something of value to each other. This value exchanged is referred to as consideration, and it must be lawful to be recognized as valid. Courts will not uphold a simple contract unless it is backed by valuable consideration, making it a crucial component in the majority of contracts.
Consideration is regarded as a vital aspect of a valid contract primarily for practical reasons. Contracts are designed to safeguard the rights and interests of the parties involved in social transactions, essentially ensuring that individuals fulfill their commitments. In commercial dealings, an exchange is always present, leading to the natural assumption that all contracts will involve some form of exchange.
Furthermore, if an agreement lacks consideration and is subsequently breached, the aggrieved party has not truly suffered a loss, as they did not relinquish anything initially, thus diminishing the necessity for such an agreement to be enforced by a court.
Consideration is a fundamental element of a contract. The principles governing consideration assert that it is necessary for a contract to be valid. However, there are specific situations in which contracts may be considered valid even in the absence of consideration.
Natural Love and Affection
An agreement that is documented and registered between two parties who share a close relationship, such as family members or spouses, is enforceable even in the absence of consideration, provided it is founded on natural love and affection.
For instance, Prakash and Janak are siblings. Their father, in his will, designates Prakash as the sole heir to his entire estate upon his passing. Janak contests this decision, seeking his rightful claim to the property, but ultimately loses the case. Subsequently, Prakash and Janak reach an amicable arrangement wherein Prakash consents to transfer half of the property to Janak and formalizes this agreement in writing.
However, Prakash later fails to honor this commitment, prompting Janak to initiate legal proceedings to reclaim his share of the property. The Court determined that the agreement, rooted in natural love and affection, exempted it from the no consideration no contract principle, thereby affirming Janak’s entitlement to recover his portion.
Past Voluntary Services
A contract may be deemed binding if an individual has previously provided voluntary services and the recipient subsequently promises to compensate them at a future date, under the following conditions:
The service was performed voluntarily in the past.
It was directed towards the promisor.
The promisor was in existence at the time the voluntary service was rendered, which is particularly significant when the promisor is an organization.
The promisor expressed a willingness to provide compensation for the voluntary service.
For example, Parbat discovers Jiwan’s wallet on the street and returns it to him. Jiwan, pleased to have recovered his lost wallet, promises to reward Parbat with Rs 2,000. In this scenario, the no consideration no contract rule is also inapplicable, rendering this agreement a valid contract.
Promise to Pay a Time-Barred Debt
When an individual provides a written promise, signed by themselves or their authorized representative, to pay a debt that is time-barred, such a promise is considered valid even in the absence of consideration. This promise may pertain to the full amount or a portion of the debt.
For instance, if Paru owes Junu Rs. 100,000, having borrowed this sum five years prior without making any repayments, and subsequently signs a written commitment to pay Rs. 50,000 as a final settlement, the principle of “no consideration no contract” does not apply in this scenario. Therefore, this constitutes a valid contract.
Creation of an Agency
An agency is established through a contract whereby one individual designates another to carry out specific tasks on their behalf. The consideration involved in such a contract is a matter of private agreement between the parties involved.
Gifts
The principle of “no consideration no contract” is not applicable to gifts. According to Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, this rule does not pertain to gifts that are given by a donor and accepted by a donee.
While the Nepalese Contract Law, 2000 does not explicitly address this issue, the Muluki Ain includes provisions allowing a party to transfer property to another as a gift without the necessity of consideration.
Bailment
Bailment refers to the transfer of goods from one individual to another for a specific purpose. This transfer occurs under a contract stipulating that upon completion of the intended purpose, the goods will either be returned or disposed of according to the instructions of the individual who delivered them. It is important to note that no consideration is required to establish a bailment contract.
Charity
If a person undertakes a liability on the promise of another to contribute to charity, then the contract is valid. In this case, the “no consideration no contract” rule does not apply.
Example: Pratap is the trustee of his town’s charity organization. He wants to build a small pond in the town to enhance greenery and offer the residents a good place to walk around in the evenings. He raises a charity fund where he appeals to people to share and contribute to the cause. Many people come forward as subscribers to the fund and agree to pay Pratap their share of the amount once he enters into a contract for constructing the pond.
After raising half the amount, Pratap hires contractors for building the pond. However, 10 people back out at the last moment. Pratap files a suit against them for recovery. The Court ordered the 10 people to pay the amount to Pratap since he had undertaken a liability based on their promise to pay. Even though there was no consideration, the contract was valid and enforceable by law.
The concept of consideration is essential for the legitimacy of the majority of contracts, as it guarantees that both parties exchange something of value. Nonetheless, there are exceptions to this principle that address particular situations where fairness and legal enforceability are paramount, even in the absence of consideration. Instances of these exceptions encompass agreements formed from genuine love and affection, prior voluntary services, commitments to settle debts that are no longer enforceable, agency contracts, gifts, bailments, and charitable donations. Such exceptions illustrate the adaptability of contract law to accommodate distinct circumstances while maintaining justice and social responsibility.
All questions with answer of Chapter Nepalese Contract Law– Click here