Free consent is a crucial principle in contract law, guaranteeing that the individuals involved in a contract do so willingly and possess a comprehensive understanding of the terms to which they are consenting. This principle is vital for the validity and enforceability of a contract. As outlined in Section 14 of the Nepal Contract Act, 2056 (2000), consent is considered “free” when it is not influenced by any of the following factors:
Coercion
Consent cannot be deemed free when one party forces another to agree to a contract through the use of threats, violence, or illegal methods. For example, if an individual threatens to inflict harm on another person or their property to secure agreement to a contract, this is classified as coercion. In such cases, the consent provided is not voluntary, rendering the contract voidable at the option of the party who has been wronged.
Undue Influence
Undue influence arises when one party exploits their superior position to take advantage of the other party’s reliance, trust, or vulnerability. For instance, an authority figure, such as a guardian or employer, may persuade an individual to accept unfavorable terms. This type of consent is not freely given, as it compromises the autonomy of the influenced individual.
Fraud
Fraud is defined as the act of one party intentionally misleading the other through false statements, the concealment of critical information, or dishonest conduct to obtain consent. For example, if a seller knowingly misrepresents the quality of goods to facilitate a sale, the buyer’s consent cannot be considered free. Contracts established under fraudulent circumstances are voidable by the party that has been deceived.
Misrepresentation
Misrepresentation occurs when false information is provided or essential facts are omitted without the intent to deceive, yet it still misleads the other party. For instance, if one party inadvertently shares incorrect information regarding a product’s condition, and the other party consents based on that information, the consent is not freely given. Such contracts may be rescinded if misrepresentation is established.
Mistake
A mistake takes place when one or both parties enter into a contract based on a misunderstanding of a crucial fact. A mutual mistake, where both parties are incorrect about an essential fact, renders the contract void. Conversely, a unilateral mistake, where only one party is mistaken, does not necessarily invalidate the agreement unless the other party was aware of the mistake and took advantage of it.
Consequences of Absence of Free Consent
The lack of free consent has a significant impact on the validity and enforceability of a contract. Under the Nepal Contract Act, 2056 (2000), a contract established without free consent may be classified as either voidable or void, depending on the specific circumstances. The potential outcomes are as follows:
- Voidable Contract: A contract is deemed voidable when consent is compromised due to factors such as coercion, undue influence, fraud, or misrepresentation. In such cases, the affected party has the option to either annul or uphold the contract.
- Void Contract: A contract that arises from a mutual misunderstanding of fact is classified as void and carries no legal validity.
- Restitution: In instances where a contract is void or voidable, the party that has gained an advantage may be obligated to return the benefit received in order to restore equity.
- Compensation: The party that suffers due to fraud or misrepresentation has the right to pursue damages or compensation from the offending party.
- Non-Enforceability: Contracts that do not involve free consent are not legally enforceable, thereby safeguarding parties from unjust or involuntary agreements.
All questions with answer of Chapter Nepalese Contract Law– Click here